CNN’s fair and balanced Prius, Fusion hybrid coverage?
Did Toyota act any differently than Ford?
So, Toyota knew there might be a glitch in their braking software for the 2010 Prius, but didn’t offer a software update to consumers because they weren’t sure it was really necessary since the brakes don’t actually fail. Thus, CNNMoney ran the headline, Prius brakes: Toyota knew, didn’t tell you.
Fair enough.
Interestingly, turns out Ford did EXACTLY the same thing. For months, Ford has also known about a very similar glitch in their Fusion and Milan hybrids, but also didn’t tell consumers because the brakes don’t actually fail. However, CNN ran the headline, Ford rolls out software fix for hybrid brakes.
That’s balanced coverage?
Earlier this week, I cited another example of the CNN’s over-eagerness to slam Toyota versus other automakers, including the Prius.
So, what’s going on over at CNN? Two automakers have almost exactly the same problem, handle it almost exactly the same way, but only one is evil for doing so? Why the obvious bias? Some angles drive more revenue than others, and that’s more important than the facts? CNN likes Ford and GM better than Toyota? What’s the deal?
